Sophisticated representation in personal injury, tort, and high-stakes civil lawsuits, from catastrophic accidents and negligence claims to wrongful termination, defamation, and matters of personal liability.
When an accident, act of negligence, or wrongful act upends your life or your reputation, the path to recovery demands more than a lawsuit, it demands strategy, discretion, and relentless advocacy. We represent individuals and enterprises in high-value personal injury and tort litigation, pursuing full and fair compensation while safeguarding the relationships, standing, and assets that matter most to our clients.
From motor vehicle collisions and premises liability to catastrophic injuries and wrongful death, we prosecute negligence claims that arise when carelessness causes lasting harm. Our team builds each personal injury case on rigorous investigation, medical and economic expert testimony, and a clear accounting of damages, lost income, medical costs, pain, and diminished quality of life.
Tort law governs the civil wrongs that give rise to liability between parties. We litigate the full spectrum of intentional and negligence-based torts, including assault and battery, negligent infliction of emotional distress, product liability, and fraud, holding wrongdoers accountable and pursuing the compensatory and punitive damages our clients are owed.
An unlawful firing can derail a career and a livelihood. We represent professionals and executives in wrongful termination, retaliation, discrimination, and hostile work environment lawsuits, as well as disputes over severance, restrictive covenants, and unpaid compensation, translating workplace misconduct into a disciplined claim for relief.
A false statement can inflict damage that lingers long after the words are spoken. We pursue and defend libel and slander claims, prosecuting defamation, false light, and business disparagement actions to restore reputations and recover the financial and personal losses that follow reputational harm.
When personal liability is at stake, the consequences reach beyond the courtroom into one's finances, property, and peace of mind. We defend and prosecute high-stakes civil lawsuits, including breach of fiduciary duty, contract disputes, and claims threatening personal assets, with a measured, outcome-driven approach that weighs settlement against trial at every turn.
We provide candid assessments of litigation risk, potential outcomes, and strategic options.
Schedule Strategy SessionIn complex litigation, anticipating your opponent's next move is the key to securing a favorable outcome. At Samper Law, our complex litigation team doesn't just react to the opposition, we outmaneuver them using an insider's perspective. Our bench includes former federal appellate clerks, former prosecutors, and former insurance defense counsel.
Having clerked for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, our team possesses a master-level understanding of judicial decision-making, appellate strategy, and how to construct legally bulletproof arguments.
Having previously represented major insurance carriers, our attorneys know exactly how corporate risk adjusters and defense teams evaluate, delay, and fight claims. We use this insider knowledge to dismantle their defenses and maximize your recovery.
With deep roots in state and federal prosecution, our trial attorneys bring relentless, battle-tested litigation strategies to civil disputes.
Whether you are facing a high-stakes commercial dispute or complex civil litigation, we engineer legal strategies that dismantle the opposition's arguments from the inside out.
Schedule a Strategy Session
A former prosecutor and formidable trial attorney, Maeve commands complex federal and state litigation with an insider's mastery of courtroom and prosecutorial strategy.
View Full BioYes: a mandamus and APA complaint in federal district court can ask a judge to order USCIS to decide a delayed case, and the government generally has 60 days to respond. What the lawsuit can and cannot get you, how cases usually end, what they cost, and when filing is a mistake.
Maeve Healy, Esq.Accurate as of September 25, 2026A lawsuit filed October 5, 2026 in the District of Massachusetts challenges two USCIS policies: a May memo that presumes denial of adjustment of status absent unusual or outstanding equities, and the August policy allowing denial without a request for evidence. Both remain in effect while the case proceeds.
Maeve Healy, Esq.Accurate as of October 6, 2026On September 30, 2026, a federal court in San Francisco vacated the agency policies that collect the $100,000 H-1B payment and barred their use under both the original proclamation and the extension through September 2027. The proclamation itself stands. Here is what employers can and cannot rely on.
Daniel Lopez, Esq.Accurate as of October 13, 2026Most people held by ICE get out through a bond hearing before an immigration judge, and the bond cannot be set below $1,500. When ICE or the immigration court says no hearing is allowed, the answer is a habeas corpus petition in federal district court, and in Massachusetts the First Circuit has now sided with detainees who entered without inspection.
Maeve Healy, Esq.Accurate as of September 25, 2026